28.2 About hypotheses and assumptions
Two hypotheses are made about the population parameter:
28.2.1 Null hypotheses
Hypotheses always concern a population parameter. Hypothesising, for example, that the sample mean body temperature is equal to \(37.0^\circ\text{C}\) is pointless, because it clearly isn’t: the sample mean is \(36.8051^\circ\text{C}\). Besides, the RQ is about the unknown population: the P in POCI stands for Population.
The null hypothesis \(H_0\) offers one possible reason why the value of the sample statistic (such as the sample mean) is not the same as the value of the proposed population parameter (such as the population mean): sampling variation. Every sample is different, and so the sample statistic will vary from sample to sample; it may not be equal to the population parameter, just because of the sample used by chance. Null hypotheses always have an ‘equals’ in them (for example, the population mean equals 100, is less than or equal to 100, or is more than or equal to 100), because (as part of the decision making process), something specific must be assumed for the population parameter.
The parameter can take many different forms, depending on the context. The null hypothesis about the parameter is the default value of that parameter; for example,
- there is no difference between the parameter value in two (or more) groups;
- there is no change in the parameter value; or
- there is no relationship as measured by a parameter value.
28.2.2 Alternative hypotheses
The other hypothesis is called the alternative hypothesis \(H_1\). The alternative hypothesis offers another possible reason why the value of the sample statistic (such as the sample mean) is not the same as the value of the proposed population parameter (such as the population mean). The alternative hypothesis proposes that the value of the population parameter really is not the value claimed in the null hypothesis.
Alternative hypotheses can be one-tailed or two-tailed. A two-tailed alternative hypothesis means, for example, that the population mean could be either smaller or larger than what is claimed. A one-tailed alternative hypothesis admits only one of those two possibilities. Most (but not all) hypothesis tests are two-tailed.
The decision about whether the alternative hypothesis is one- or two-tailed is made by reading the RQ (not by looking at the data). Indeed, the RQ and hypotheses should (in principle) be formed before the data are obtained, or at least before looking at the data if the data are already collected.
The ideas are the same whether the alternative hypothesis is one- or two-tailed: based on the data and the sample statistic, a decision is to be made about whether the alternative hypotheses is supported by the data.
Example 28.1 (Alternative hypotheses) For the body-temperature study, the alternative hypothesis is two-tailed: The RQ asks if the population mean is \(37.0^\circ\text{C}\) or not. That is, two possibilities are considered: that \(\mu\) could be either larger or smaller than \(37.0^\circ\text{C}\).
A one-tailed alternative hypothesis would be appropriate if the RQ was: ‘Is the population mean internal body temperature greater than \(37.0^\circ\text{C}\)?’ or Is the population mean internal body temperature smaller than \(37.0^\circ\text{C}\)?.Important points about forming hypotheses:
- Hypotheses always concern a population parameter.
- Null hypotheses always contain an ‘equals.’
- Alternative hypothesis are one-tailed or two-tailed, depending on the RQ.
- Hypotheses emerge from the RQ (not the data): The RQ and the hypotheses could be written down before collecting the data.